A minus sign in front of investment returns may not be the only
change superannuation fund members notice with their annual reports
this year.
With super funds preparing to publish annual reports that will
show losses for the first time since 2002, the Australian
Securities and Investments Commission has expedited a cost-saving
measure in return for which funds must include greater detail in
their separately published member statements.
The regulator says provision of this extra information will be
timely, given the likely slide in super fund returns and hopefully
will prevent members making a knee-jerk decision to switch
investment options or even funds.
ASIC says it will let super funds provide annual reports
electronically as the default form of delivery - where members
receive a printed copy only if they ask for one - as long as those
funds add extra information about medium and long-term returns in
their regular member statements.
Funds already have to report five-year performances in annual
reports but ASIC says this information would be more usefully
conveyed in member statements, where it's "more likely to be
read".
It has indicated that it wants to see both five-year and 10-year
measures in member statements, along with the usual annual
performance and individual account balance.
Initially, that information may be provided in generic form -
how typical investment options have played out over the years. Yet
ASIC hopes that in subsequent years it could become "personalised",
detailing how an individual member's investments have performed
over five and 10 years.
This will be mandatory for funds that switch from paper to
online annual reports but even funds that decide to stick with
printed reports as their default option will be encouraged to
provide the extra detail voluntarily. ASIC has issued a "regulatory
guide" on information in periodic statements, setting out what it
considers best practice.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia welcomes
the changes, saying they will improve communication with members,
reduce the industry's carbon footprint and, according to its
calculation, save the industry up to $88 million.
The association couldn't say to what extent those savings might
filter down to members, however. Chief executive Pauline Vamos says
it will differ from fund to fund and some may need to use at least
part of the cost savings to improve their systems.
ASIC has been talking to funds about online delivery of annual
reports for a couple of years and issued a consultation paper
earlier this year.
The regulator says many super funds saw potential for
substantial cost savings and were keen to make the switch as soon
as possible. And with investment returns slumping, the regulator
and funds are keen that members take a long-term view.
Even though its formal policy hasn't been finalised, ASIC has
told funds it will turn a blind eye if they switch to default
online delivery in coming months, as long as they meet those other
conditions. They won't have to take the usual step of applying
individually to make such a change because of this "no-action"
approach.
The changes will eventually be formalised in "class order
relief" setting out the rules for everyone.
"Nearly everyone who responded to our electronic disclosure
consultation thought less paper in super was a good idea," says
ASIC deputy chairman Jeremy Cooper. "[And] now that super returns
are likely to be down this year on past years, we think it's a good
time to roll this out."
The latest figures from the Australian Prudential Regulation
Authority show the total return on assets in super funds was minus
7.7 per cent in the March quarter. Researcher SuperRatings
estimates that super fund losses will be about 6 per cent over the
year.
Super fund members who exercised investment choice and ticked
the box on a more aggressive option, involving a high allocation to
shares, face even bigger losses - more likely in the double
digits.
"We think that many super funds will want to provide a
longer-term picture of super returns to members who might not fully
appreciate that super returns fluctuate over time and that even
negative returns during some periods can be consistent with
successful long-term investment," ASIC said in a statement
accompanying its decision. "Not having this perspective might
result in some fund members focusing on short-term results and, in
a year of negative returns, potentially engaging in switching
behaviour, to their ultimate detriment." (See also
http://www.fido.gov.au/superreturns.)
Consultants Watson Wyatt last week ran some numbers on the
scenario of a fund member switching investment options each time
their chosen "balanced growth" option underperformed the more
conservative option.
According to the super fund consultant, the typical balanced
growth option has earned an average of 10.3 per cent a year over
the past 20 years, compared with 8.7 per cent for a conservative or
"capital stable" option. However, there were several years when the
conservative option performed better than the growth option.
"During that period, if a member had switched their account
balance to the better-performing option from the previous year,
then they would have ended up switching 10 times and successfully
wiped off about 0.7 per cent a year in performance, compared with
just sticking with the growth option," says managing director
Andrew Boal.
Over a lifetime of investing, say 40 years, clipping your
returns by 0.7 per cent a year would reduce your final retirement
lump sum by 15 per cent.
"For the average super fund member, that could mean their super
savings run out three or four years earlier," Boal says.
Retail industry fund REST is Australia's largest super fund by
members, with 1.7 million accounts, and many of its members are
relatively young and new to super, so some will not have
experienced anything other than a bull market (see returns left
page).
REST won't be moving to a default electronic annual report this
year but, regardless, will voluntarily add 10-year fund performance
to the five-year measure it already provides.
"We've had five good years - years that we as funds and our
members couldn't really have expected. If you look at it over six
to 10 years you're getting a more realistic view of what
expectations should be for long-term investing," says chief
executive Damian Hill.
While he acknowledges that the cost savings from electronic
delivery are likely to be significant for many funds, the sheer
volume of reports and statements REST sends out means that it
secures discounts that keep the unit cost of each report low. The
annual report and member statement go out in one package in any
case.
"But we are very supportive of the ASIC statement and, even
though we don't see great cost savings, we do think it opens up the
opportunity for more meaningful communication with members," Hill
says.
REST members are already allowed to "opt in" to receive an
electronic report but only 100,000 do so.
5 AND 10 YEAR AV. RETURNS AFTER MANAGEMENT COSTS
Lowest and highest average returns
Capital Capital
As at June 30, 2007 Growth Balanced stable guaranteed
5 years 9.5 - 11.5% 8.2 - 10.8% 6.3 - 7.5% 4.7 - 5.3%
10 years 7.2 - 9% 6.3 - 8.6% 5.2 - 5.8% 4.8 - 5.2%
As at June 30, 2006
5 years 5.7 - 7.5% 5.1 - 7.4% 4.8 - 5.9% 3.7 - 4.3%
10years 7.6 - 9.4% 6.8 - 9.3% 5.7 - 7.3% 4.2 - 5.9%
As at June 30, 2005
5 years 3.7 - 5.6% 3.6 - 5.3% 4.2 - 5.5% 3.7 - 4.4%
10 years 7 - 8.7% 6.5 - 8.8% 5.6 - 7.2% 5.1 - 5.8%
As at June 30, 2004
5 years 3.6 - 5.4% 3 - 5.3% 3.7 - 6.2% 3.8 - 5.2%
10 years 6.5 - 7.9% 6.2 - 8% 5.5 - 6.7% 4.9 5.7%
SOURCE: ASIC, MORNINGSTAR, SELECTINGSUPER AND SUPERRATINGS