My father has a British pension. The fund has decided to
transfer the money and purchase an annuity for pensioners. They
have a once-only choice to take a lump sum instead of the annuity.
It is 80,000 pounds ($164,000) and he gets a 7000 pound pension per
annum, reduced to half when my mother dies. Dad is 77 and mum 75.
They have other small British pensions that are being eroded by the
higher Australian dollar. I think the options are as below and am
trying to weigh up what to do. 1. He can accept the income from the
annuity, which will give him income certainty but there is no
increase. Any interest may be taxed as income and he may suffer
from exchange rate movement. 2. He can take the lump sum and invest
it in Britain which would preserve his capital but interest is
taxed as income. He may suffer from exchange rate movements and
also possibly Australian tax.
3. He can transfer it here into a complying fund registered as a
Qualifying Registered Overseas Pension Scheme (QROPS). There is
probably no increase in the balance value since he left Britain
three years ago and he would then receive a tax-free income as an
Australian pension.
4. He can transfer it here and invest it, which would preserve
capital, but would he be taxed on the balance transferred and is
the interest taxed as income? I. R.
I suspect your mother would get 50 per cent of the pension if
your father predeceases her.
Better check that. Looking at the choices:
1. The annuity would give him the maximum certainty of income
but, when you say there is no increase, it sounds as though the
annuity is not indexed to inflation. This is somewhat unusual in
Britain. Check this, just to make sure you've got the facts
straight. Any lack of indexation would decrease the purchasing
power of the annuity. You might be better off investing in a fund
that will, hopefully, keep up with inflation or even surpass
it.
2. I'm not an expert on British pensions, but I understand that,
if taken as a lump sum, the first 25 per cent will be tax free and
the balance will attract a 40 per cent tax rate in Britain. I don't
see how investing a lump sum in Britain would necessarily preserve
his capital unless he placed it into a capital guaranteed fund, in
which case he could just as readily place the money into a
guaranteed fund in Australia and overcome the currency exchange
problem. However, I suspect that, if the resource boom slows down
the Australian dollar will fall for a while.
3. A QROPS has the approval of the British Government to accept
a British pension fund transfer and agrees to abide by certain
British restrictions.
However, since May 2006, a transfer from a non-Australian fund
is seen as a contribution, not a rollover between complying
Australian funds. Hence it is subject to the local contribution
rules which mean that a person aged 75 or older cannot contribute
into an Australian super fund.
4. If your father brought the money into Australia he could
invest it in the non-super sphere such as buying an annuity
(possibly with a higher return than a British annuity), or shares
or managed funds.
Tax return for British payout
My 65 year-old wife has recently been granted a British pension
of $180 per four weeks. Does she have to declare this pension in
her Australian income tax return? A.A.
If she is an Australian resident then, if her total income
exceeds $6000 a year, she is required to submit a tax return,
unless she also received an Australian Government pension and
earned less than $10,000. If she is a non-resident she should put
in a tax return. Check the Tax Office website.
To stick or to bite the bullet?
I purchased 300 MFS shares back in 2006 at $3.27, and then
again in 2007 when I bought another 150 at $5.55. They stayed quite
stable until January this year when they fell to 99c and stayed
there. The latest news is a renaming, Octaviar (OCV), and apparent
plans (?) for stabilising the business. My question is, should I
stick with them and hope for an improvement in the situation, or
bite the bullet, sell and take the loss. E.R.
The MFS/Octaviar group is an amazing story of rags to riches and
back to rags in three years. The stock rose from a low of $1.30 in
2005 to a peak above $6.50 in early 2007, and last traded in late
June at 99c. The lessons of history would discourage any great
chance of recovery but I wouldn't fancy your chances of finding any
buyers.
If you have a question for George Cochrane, send it to Personal
Investment, PO Box 3001, Tamarama, NSW, 2026. Helplines: bank
ombudsman 1300780808; pensions 132800.